Discussion Forum  Sign Guestbook  View Guestbook  Last 04th February 2005   You are visitor Site Meter

  Home/Motivation
  Historical Review
  Sharing disparities
  The Constitution
  Ten Benefits
  Audio Speeches
  White Papers
  Economic Impact
  2004 Budget
  Friendship Treaty
  1998 Referendum
  Nevisian Leaders
  Nevis Today
  Patriotic Calypsos
  Town Halls
  Articles
  All About this site
 Listen Von Radio

  Send Emails to
   swagga@hotmail.com.
GRASSROOTS

We are willing to work tirelessly for the future of an independent Nevis. What are you willing to do? We are prepared to make some sacrifices if we have to. What are you prepared to do? We want to be proud first-class citizens of a free and independent country. What do you want to be? And we will vote YES for a free and independent Nevis!

Grassroots is an organization dedicated to Nevis Independence

A GRASSROOTS COMMUNIQUE

Grassroots announces its intention to start off the new year by moving with all deliberate speed to carry its message of full and unqualified support for the YES vote seeking independence for Nevis in the upcoming referendum, into every community and household on the island of Nevis. We will spare no quarter in our effort to clarify the aim of the referendum, which has become so clouded with other issues that the populace is in danger of losing sight of its purpose.

For instance; those who are insisting that everything should be in place first, clearly don’t know what they are talking about, because in the same breath they say that things have improved so much under the present Federal Administration that there is now no reason to leave. That’s what is commonly said to be ‘double-talk’ in polite circles. Among the common people, a less polite term is commonly used. These people should have spoken up before the Federation of St.Kitts and Nevis was brought into being and insisted that ‘everything should be in place first.’

But forget that - in the first place, any people anywhere who seek to improve their situation by withdrawing from whatever arrangement constrains them, don’t wait until ‘everything is in place first’, they move out from under the yoke at the first opportunity and then put their hearts and souls into the task of building their future unfettered. That is the way the choice for freedom and independence works. No people have ever elected to stay in a bad situation until things got better before they left. Except masochists.

On the second point, improvements that have taken place in Nevis have occurred despite the troublesome inequitable relationship, and not because the Federal Administration had finally recognised and treated Nevis like an equal partner. These and other misleading ideas are some of the things that Grassroots will hasten to clarify in attempting to remove the cloud of confusion regarding the referendum in the coming days.

We will strip away the false presumptions and pretensions that have so cluttered up the debate that the image of a free and independent Nevis has been made by some, to resemble a lunar landscape or a disaster zone. We will use every legal means at hand to get our message across in units that are concise, digestible, enlightening, and in some cases, entertaining.

BOO!
A Grassroots Communique - January 30th 2004

There seem to be a few clever opponents of secessionists willing to say the most outrageous things in order to score a few points against us and scare the electorate into voting NO in the next referendum in Nevis. One of the things the opposition is fond of saying, is that Nevis is not ready to secede yet, that we should solve all our social and economic problems first. In other words, if we don’t solve these pressing problems first we will not be able to operate successfully as an independent country.

If this brilliant piece of advice had been offered and accepted by others in previous times and other places, mankind would still be living in the middle ages, or perhaps even the stone age. No slaves for instance, would ever have attempted to be free! No country on earth has been able to solve all of its problems. Not ever. Even the richest and strongest countries like the USA, Canada, France and Germany, despite their wealth, eminence and power, are struggling just like the poorest to deal with crime, poverty, education, health, unemployment and other serious problems.

“Homeless people” for instance, are a well-known phenomenon on the streets of London, Paris, New York, and Toronto. All peoples in all countries have always had to try to deal with these problems from biblical times to the present day. Some advances have been made, not because people elected to stay in circumstances that were unfavourable to them, but because they chose to leave and blaze new trails after they were free to do so.

Another thing the opposition likes to scare people with is the fact that the UN, USA, UK, WTO and other important agencies and nations are not openly backing the secession drive in Nevis. But that is nothing new or surprising; they don’t openly support secession efforts anywhere. They would be guilty of interfering in a sovereign country’s internal affairs if they did. But that certainly doesn’t mean that they are going to ignore us after we achieve independence as the opposition is loudly claiming. That is a completely false picture of what is most likely to happen.

Once Nevis achieves Independence and seeks recognition as an independent sovereign nation, other world bodies, countries and agencies will consider and make their own determination on how best to deal with us. Bearing in mind that we are not, or will not be a rogue state, or a terrorist territory or a communist enclave, or a threat to anybody – a range of diplomatic exchanges is likely to commence as soon as the constitutional majority of people in Nevis have indicated with a YES vote in the referendum, that Nevis should withdraw from the federation with St.Kitts. It cannot logically, legally, or of course, constitutionally happen before that.

The earliest diplomatic discussions will probably be with the UK who created our federation in the first place and included the constitutional provision that allows Nevis to secede, and also with St.Kitts, which according to the constitution, will then become a sovereign state on its own. British diplomats will probably mediate the earliest discussions between Nevis and St.Kitts, followed by diplomatic missions from other Caribbean countries.

The USA and Canada will surely not be lagging far behind with some sort of early diplomatic response since they both have close ties to Nevis and St.Kitts and would be eager to help engineer a smooth transition so that any disruption or deviation from the norm is minimised. Other countries that are not as close physically but have an established relationship with Nevis are Kuwait, France, Germany and Taiwan.

To suggest that all of these countries are going to turn their backs on us and end their friendly relationship if we gain our independence from St.Kitts, is a scenario that simply doesn’t hold water. It would be the only time in modern world history that other nations turned away from a new, non-belligerent nation simply because it had succeeded in its secession bid. Hopefully, the electorate will see through the holes in this cheap, transparent deception and not be frightened off.

Careful thought and consideration will clearly lead to the conclusion that since there is no military conflict, warfare, bloodshed,   insurrection   or  coup,   but

simply a totally harmless, modern,

constitutional option being exercised in the prescribed manner by Nevis, punitive action by other friendly nations is not called for nor appropriate and would make no sense at all. There has been no need to take sides in a dispute, to call upon NATO or UN peacekeeping forces, the Red Cross has not had to rush in supplies for starving, beaten, frightened and dislocated refugees.

To what purpose or what end would other countries banish us from the community of nations? Would it make any of them bigger or more powerful, or more tolerant, or more exemplary to say “Nevis is too small and insignificant for us to bother with”? Where is the rationale?

The opposition accuses the secessionists of mindless and reckless propaganda for merely supporting the age-old dream of secession for Nevis. But the kind of blather they are trying to scare people away from the polls with, reveals a sorry lack of candour or responsibility. If they were really so fearful of Nevis taking on the responsibilities of an independent nation that their trepidation overpowers their reasoning, we might truly feel sorry for them. But from all appearances and also past performances, they know perfectly well that the ridiculous scare tactics they use will probably affect some portion of the electorate, perhaps enough to foil the YES vote in the referendum and kill the age-old dream of independence for Nevis. Shame on them! There’s really nothing thing left to say  about these scare tactics except boo!

Why The Rush?
A Grassroots Communique - January 31st 2004

Incredibly, the forces in opposition to the referendum are still asking that question although Nevisians have been discussing the pros and cons of separating from St.Kitts for decades. The previous administration’s early popularity had been won by its promise to seek secession for Nevis at all costs. But they were actually following the wishes that had been voiced by the general population  much, much earlier.

The present administration renewed that age-old effort in 1996 and has kept that intention high on its agenda and in clear focus on its political platform ever since. In the interim there have been high-profile federal and local commissions relevant to the issue, there has been a narrowly failed referendum, there have been radio talk shows, newspaper articles, town hall meetings and the inevitable street corner and rum shop discussions going on ad-infinitum.

It is deceitful to suggest that there is some kind of mad rush by the secessionists to get the people to vote in a referendum before they have all the facts or before they have been fully prepared. The people of Nevis have been prepared for decades and over the years have accumulated more knowledge and facts about what seceding involves than most of the people who were living in countries that have already done so. And the Nevis Island Administration has fully complied with constitutional requirements for educating the populace prior to holding a referendum.

All this effort to inform and prepare the public consumes time and resources. This is a necessary expenditure of course, and completely justifiable. But at some point in time it has to end, and action must begin with a determination made by the people. The opposition though, wants all the talks, meetings commissions and discussions to continue indefinitely. And they have used every ruse they could think of to try to stall the proceedings with delaying tactics, in the hope and expectation that significant numbers of voters will become weary of it all and not bother to turn up at the polls, or else vote NO because they’ve been led to believe that too many questions have been left unanswered.

It is not exactly a brilliant tactic, but its effectiveness can be enhanced if the administration’s timetable for the referendum is stretched beyond a certain point. The enthusiasm and willingness of supporters will be sorely tested if the boredom of going over and over the same ground is allowed to set in. The time for taking the vote and making the decision is when public interest is the highest, when everyone is most alert and feels most keenly about the issues which have been under such thorough and stringent examination for so long.

That is the best time for those on both sides of the  issue, for it is likely to ensure a larger turnout at the polls and thus more accurately reflect the choice of the true majority of the people. It has taken years and years for things to reach this point in Nevis. That is far from the misleading opposition claims of rushing. It is time now for Nevisians to go to the polls again. After all these years, there is simply no need and no reasonable purpose for further delay. There has been no rush fellahs… why the ruse?